cft_logo_animate.gif (16428 bytes)

Christians for Truth

       

 


AGM
CFT Beliefs
Christian News
Newsletter
Q & A
Actions
Articles
Links
Contact
President
Audio
                        

Christian News

30 Aug 2007
________________________________________________

Southern Africa:

* CHILDREN’S AMENDMENT BILL WOULD TURN PARENTS INTO CRIMINALS OVERNIGHT
* ABORTION TO BE PIVOTAL ISSUE FOR NEXT ELECTIONS

* CHILDREN’S AMENDMENT BILL WOULD TURN PARENTS INTO CRIMINALS OVERNIGHT - As deliberations on the Children’s Amendment Bill begin in Parliament tomorrow, the Christian Action Network has called for the clause banning the spanking of children by parents to be scrapped.

"This Bill would turn law-abiding, diligent parents into criminals overnight. An outright ban on smacking could not be consistently enforced. It would waste police time on trivial incidents while genuine cases of child abuse go unchecked," says International Co-ordinator of the Christian Action Network, Taryn Hodgson.

"A ban is not necessary. An ordinary spank is not child abuse. Most parents spank their children at some point. Does Parliament believe they are all child abusers? Nor does spanking teach children that violence is the answer. Most people were spanked as a child and are now perfectly peaceful citizens.

"Before this bill, "unreasonable chastisement" was outlawed and this protected children from abuse. However, to specifically outlaw ‘reasonable chastisement’ is to force parents to neglect their Biblical and civic duty to discipline their children.

"To say children should have the same rights under the law as adults is an absurd oversimplification. There are many differences in law for children. For obvious reasons children are not allowed to drink alcohol, purchase cigarettes, drive, marry, vote or own a firearm licence. No one claims 'inequality' on these issues.

"A vocal minority is calling for a total ban on all forms of physical punishment. This minority includes well-organised children’s charities and child-rights groups. They say that all smacking is child abuse. Most people disagree. Most reasonable people see there is a world of difference between abuse and loving discipline.

"Abortion is the child abuse as it kills a pre-born child. Loving discipline of a child prevents abuse and can save lives.

"Mothers bear the burden of looking after young children. New laws on physical punishment will therefore target mothers as they struggle to raise their children. Children could convict their parents of assault just for spanking them.

"Of course, it is never right for a parent to spank when they have lost their temper. Nor should a parent discipline a child for being a child, it would be indefensible to smack a child who simply made a child’s mistake. And parents should never have inappropriate expectations or put impossible demands on their children. All this represents bad parenting. But banning all smacking is unnecessary and frankly unworkable.

Child abuse is already illegal.

"Social workers and the police certainly have their work cut out keeping up with the number of cases, but the law-makers have failed to explain how there are problems with the existing law. Indeed this has not even been attempted.

"The existing law is firm enough and fair enough to protect children."

The Christian Action Network’s recommendation is: remove the ban on corporal punishment from section 139 of the Bill and leave the existing law as it is.

CONTACT: International Co-ordinator of the Christian Action Network, Taryn Hodgson on 072 215 4801 or 021-689 4480, E-mail: info@christianaction.org.za. Website: www.christianaction.org.za. (Christian Action Media Release, 27 Aug 2007) (to index)

* ABORTION TO BE PIVOTAL ISSUE FOR NEXT ELECTIONS - The public's recent condemnation of abortion-on-demand was so overwhelming that it ought to become a pivotal issue during the upcoming South African elections. Doctors For Life International (DFL) monitored countrywide public hearings and found that the general public consider abortion-on-demand to be morally wrong.

Even though the Abortion Amendment Bill was under discussion, the public refused to confine themselves to it. To the contrary, at most of the hearings the public expressed their extreme dismay over the legality of abortion-on-demand. Often chairpersons of these hearings would speak in the defence of abortion, but the public could not be swayed in their convictions and continued to voice their protest against the inhumanity of abortion. A few examples are:

  • In Polokwane (Limpopo Province) 99% of the public favoured the abolition of abortion-on-demand in a show of hands. Strong language such as "we don 't want this thing (abortion)" was used.
  • In Johannesburg (Gauteng Province) the audience gave Dr Monika Molathlegi (DFL representative) a standing ovation when she called on Parliament to reconsider the abortion law.
  • In Cape Town (Western Cape Province) numerous organisations, churches and civil society organisations articulated their objections to abortion.
  • In Pietermaritzburg (KwaZulu-Natal Province) more than 99% of the audience strongly objected to abortion.
  • In East London (Eastern Cape Province) the chairperson remarked that the entire audience is opposed to abortion.
  • In Secunda (Mpumalanga Province) more than 90% of people unequivocally rejected both the Principal Abortion Act as well the Amendment Bill.
  • In Kimberly (Northern Cape Province) all speakers from the general public expressed their opposition to the legality of abortion.

These are just a few examples of the public' s overwhelming unhappiness with the current Termination of Pregnancy Act and its proposed amendment.

The public hearings were conducted subsequent to DFL successfully challenging the Abortion Amendment Act in the Constitutional Court. The Court declared the Act invalid on the grounds that the public was not properly consulted as required by the Constitution. The effect of the order was suspended and Parliament was given 18 months to facilitate public involvement in the process of passing the Bill. Consequently more than 80 public hearings were conducted across South Africa in respect of the Abortion Amendment Bill

Parliament is constitutionally prohibited from disregarding public opinion and must give effect to the will of the people. (DoctorsForLifeInternational Media Release, 27 Aug 2007) (to index)

International

* VISION 2025
* BIBLE SOCIETY TO OPEN OFFICE IN IRAQ
* CHURCH MURDER SUSPECT WAS FAMILY
* JUDICIAL ACTIVIST RULES IOWA DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT UNCONSTITUTIONAL
* SOUTH KOREAN HOSTAGES FREED: TROUBLING ISSUES REMAIN

* VISION 2025 - Serving in partnership worldwide to see Bible translation begun by 2025 in every remaining language community that needs it, John Watters, Executive Director of Wycliffe International writes, "God continues to allow us to participate in the greatest acceleration in Bible translation the world has ever seen! Nearly 30% of the languages in which there is currently some Bible translation did not have such activity seven years ago...there are new projects among 539 language communities, potentially impacting over 160 million people!

Based on continuing research and evaluation, we now estimate that Bible translation may still be needed in approximately 2,286 languages. This number shows a significant drop from the 1999 estimate of 3,000 languages still possibly needing Bible translation. The difference of 714 includes the 539 languages in which work has begun during the past seven years. The decrease of an additional 175 languages is based on updated knowledge of these languages and their needs."

Worldwide Bible Translation Statistics are as follows:

  • World Population—6.5 billion
  • Languages spoken in the world—6,912 [Ethnologue, 15th Edition, 2005]
  • Languages with probable need of Bible translation—2,286
  • Languages with some or all of the Bible—2,426. Of these, 429 have an adequate Bible; 1,144 have an adequate New Testament; 853 have Scripture portions [UBS 2006]
  • Language-based development and translation programs in progress—1,941
  • New language programs begun in Bibleless language communities since October 1, 1999 (the beginning of Vision 2025)—539 (32 in 2006).
  • Language work in progress—Wycliffe personnel are working in Bible translation, literacy and/or preparatory linguistic work in 1,379 languages (71% of all translation projects worldwide; 26 projects were begun in 2006 with Wycliffe involvement).
  • Countries represented by the languages in which Wycliffe personnel are working—97 (including work among people who live outside their traditional homeland).
  • Translation—In its 70+ years of history, Wycliffe personnel have been involved in the translation of 710 New Testaments and Bibles representing over 78 million people.
  • Production—In 2006, Wycliffe personnel were involved in the completion of 3 Bibles; 14 New Testaments; 21 Jesus videos; 6 Luke videos and 1 Genesis video.

These statistics offer the most current estimates available. (Wycliffe International – www.wycliffe.net, March 2007) (to index)

* BIBLE SOCIETY TO OPEN OFFICE IN IRAQ - The Bible Society has received official permission to open a local office in the region of Kurdistan, northern Iraq, and is planning to fund a Kurdish office in the city of Erbil from next year.

News that the permission had been granted reached Nabil Omeish, the Program Coordinator for the Bible Society's work in Iraq, in a phone call last month while he was on holiday in France. Cutting his holiday short and leaving his family in Europe, Mr Omeish flew to Jordan and on to Erbil, one of the leading cities in the Kurdish Autonomous Region.

On arrival, he met the government official who had contacted him, and after completing all the formalities, he was handed a 'Faraman' – or government decree – in the Kurdish Surani language, giving the Bible Society official permission to open an office and conduct all its functions and activities in the self-governing region.

Although the timing of the news may have taken Mr Omeish by surprise, it was in fact the result of months of hard work and visits by him to various government offices and officials. In addition, the printing and distribution for the first time, last December, of 20,000 Kurdish Scripture Calendars (see Latest News # 384) speeded up the process: the sight of the Scripture Calendars on many desks in government and public offices is an indicator of the strong impact that the Bible Society work has had in the region.

Mike Bassous, General Secretary of the Bible Society in Lebanon, also responsible for the work in Iraq, emphasised the importance of moving in response to the decree. "It is very important that we translate this official approval into action," he said, "by opening a branch in the Kurdish region to strengthen our work amongst the Kurdish Church."

In fact, in anticipation of the decree, the Bible Society in Lebanon had already set up an unfunded project to establish an office in Erbil. In 2008, it is planning to staff a Kurdish person to coordinate its work in the region.

Kurdistan itself is an autonomous region inside Iraq's borders. Administered by the Kurdistan Regional Government, it has its own governing bodies and functionaries, such as a parliament, prime minister and cabinet ministers. The region has become a safe haven for the displaced Iraqi Christians seeking security inside Iraq.

Meanwhile, the Bible Society continues to operate from its office and warehouse in Baghdad. A new branch in the relatively secure northern region will strengthen its mission and be very effective for the Bible cause. (United Bible Societies, 17 Aug 2007) (to index)

* CHURCH MURDER SUSPECT WAS FAMILY – Kernal Rehobson and the man now accused of killing him were relatives who took different paths, family members and fellow Micronesian immigrants said: One gained respect in this rural town as a preacher and community leader, while the other lost it by drinking heavily.

When Ekien Elam Saimon opened fire inside a church here on Sunday, Rehobson was the first to die, witnesses said.

Both men arrived here nearly 20 years ago from Micronesia, but it was Rehobson who gained influence in Neosho’s tightly knit community of hundreds of Micronesian immigrants.

"I think Saimon was jealous," said Lou Rehobson-Manuel.

"He wasn’t a leader; he didn’t do a lot. He liked to party, and Kernal is the opposite."

Authoriteis said Saimon entered the church with two handguns, killing three men and wounding four other people. As he approached the congregation he cursed the men as liars and accused them of attacking his reputation behind his back.

Saimon, 52, surrendered to police after the shooting and is being held without bail in Newton County jail. The next hearing is scheduled for August 28.

Saimon is charged with three counts of first-degree murder; four counts of assault and one count of felonious restraint on suspicion of holding the congregation hostage. (Daily News, 15 August 2007) (to index)

* JUDICIAL ACTIVIST RULES IOWA DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT UNCONSTITUTIONAL - Polk County Judge Robert Hanson (not to be confused with convicted spy Robert Hanssen) has miraculously divined that the framers of the Iowa constitution really intended that Iowans of the same sex must be allowed to "marry" one another. The unelected Hanson struck down Iowa's Defense of Marriage Act on Thursday ruling that, "Couples, such as Plaintiffs, who are otherwise qualified to marry one another may not be denied licenses to marry or certificates of marriage or in any other way be prevented from entering into a civil marriage pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 595 by reason of the fact that both persons, compromising such a couple, are of the same sex."

Within two hours of the ruling homosexual couples began applying for marriage licenses.

Addressing the decision, Matt Barber, Policy Director for Cultural Issues with Concerned Women for America (CWA) said, "Through his actions, Judge Hanson has arrogantly ignored the will of the people by cavalierly disregarding a law constitutionally enacted by Iowa citizens through their elected representatives in 1998.

"Once again we have another renegade judge abusing the authority he's been granted and arbitrarily legislating from the bench. Hanson is a judicial activist. He's just one man - a county judge - who has haughtily trampled on the concept of separation of powers, the elected state legislature and the people of Iowa in order to push his own radical agenda.

"It's preposterous to think that the framers of the Iowa constitution could have even imagined that the document they were drafting would someday be distorted in such a way as to force "'gay' marriage" upon Iowa.

"This case proves once again that the only way to assure that the institution of marriage is protected - and not radically redefined into oblivion - is to pass a federal marriage amendment," concluded Barber.

The case is expected to be appealed to the Iowa Supreme Court. (Concerned Women for America, 31 Aug 2007) (to index)

* SOUTH KOREAN HOSTAGES FREED: TROUBLING ISSUES REMAIN - Nineteen South Koreans held hostage by Taliban rebels since July 19 have been freed and are now in the custody of South Korean government officials. The hostages were released in five handoffs starting August 29 and ending on August 30. All were handed over to representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) at undisclosed locations.

A South Korean government official said the hostages would be reunited and returned to their home country as soon as possible. ICRC officials said the newly released hostages appear to be in good health.

The hostages were released after South Korean officials reached an agreement with Taliban representatives to withdraw the nation's 200 military personnel from Afghanistan and end all missionary work in the nation. That agreement has come under fire from many observers, including members of the South Korean media, who note that the action lends credibility to the radical Islamic group even though its demand for a prisoner exchange was not met.

"Although the Taliban did not achieve their stubborn demands for a prisoner swap, they certainly obtained a lot in terms of political credibility through their direct negotiations with a foreign government in their 'territory,'" said one Korean Times editorial.

The editorial asserts that the negotiations worked to undermine the Afghanistan government as well as international efforts in the war on terror. The government in Kabul is still recovering from the heavy criticism it encountered in March when it freed five Taliban in exchange for an Italian hostage.

One leading South Korean paper, Dong-A Ilbo, said the Seoul government showed weakness in its dealings with the kidnappers and may have increased the chances of more South Koreans being abducted.

The Afghan hostage situation does not end with the release of the 19 South Koreans. Taliban extremists are still holding German engineer Rudolf Blechschmidt. Blechschmidt, his colleague Ruediger Diedrich and five Afghans were abducted the day before the abduction of the 23 South Koreans.

Three days after their capture, Diedrich's body was discovered. He had been shot to death. Taliban militants also shot to death two of the South Korean hostages, including the group's pastor. Two South Korean women were released last week as a "good will" gesture.

The deal brokered by the South Korean government, which calls for the end to all missionary work in the nation by South Koreans, is troubling to many in the faith community. The Saemmul Presbyterian Church, to which the former hostages belong, insists that its volunteers were providing humanitarian aid, not evangelizing. It remains to be seen what impact there will be internationally from the South Korean government's concession that humanitarian aid efforts qualify as proselytizing. A New York Times article estimates that some 17,000 South Koreans serve as fulltime missionaries, along with countless volunteers and short-term aid workers, many in predominantly Muslim nations.

There is also the issue of what power the Seoul government has to control the missionary and human aid work of a vast array of independent churches. While it is certain that churches will review their outreach efforts in light of the government's agreement, there is much less certainty that believing congregations will abandon the Great Commission based on their national government's agreement with Islamic extremists.

Continue to pray for Christian missionaries around the world - from every nation - who remain in peril from the actions of Islamic militants. (Concerned Women for America, 31 Aug 2007) (to index)

 

 

revolv.gif (20906 bytes) CFT Home