cft_logo_animate.gif (16428 bytes)

Christians for Truth

       

 


AGM
CFT Beliefs
Christian News
Newsletter
Q & A
Actions
Articles
Links
Contact
President
Audio
                        

Christian News

15 October 2006
________________________________________________

Southern Africa:

 

* INTERNATIONAL LIFE CHAIN 2006 - One of the most urgent and important issues confronting the church today is the right to life of the pre-born babies. Thousands of babies are killed annually by KZN abortionists, and a powerful Life Chain always offers strong encouragement and hope for reducing that number.
International Life Chain Sunday 2006 was held at KwaDukuza, Tongaat and Durban on 30 Sept and 1 Oct 2006. This prayerful witness was also held internationally providing a visual statement of solidarity by the Christian communities that abortion is grievously wrong and that the church Christ founded opposes the unmerciful killing of the pre-born babies. Those present held placards that read “abortion kills babies”, “abortion hurts women”, “one murdered, one wounded”, while standing 5 meters apart.
At the KwaDukuza Life Chain pastor BD Saul, of the Assemblies of God, challenged the local churches to make it an urgent priority to expose, oppose and end this war against children made in the image of God. Pastor Vani Komal of the Baptist Faith Centre and Mrs Sheila Arumugam of KwaDukuza played a very important role in organising the KwaDukuza Life Chain. The public displayed a very positive reaction at these Life Chains.
Bruno Hlongwane from Christians for Truth stated, “even though the government has passed the bill, which makes it legal to abort, we still want to remind our people that abortion is killing innocent babies and those who do it actually commit murder”.
According to one of the organisers, Sheila Arumugam, the event was prompted by the victory of Doctors for Life, a Non-Profit Governmental Organisation (NGO) which took the government to court, challenging the constitutionality of the bill, legalising abortion.
The bill was subsequently retracted in August this year, forcing the government to put the bill to vote, over 18 months.
“This was the first leg of mass demonstrations and campaigns to raise awareness among the public. In February we will repeat the same, where we will be handing over a petition to the authorities”, Arumugam said.
Diana Rauschenbaum, Life Child Project coordinator at Doctors for Life in Zimbali, said the event was also in commemoration of the Sanctity Life Sunday (first Sunday of October). The demonstration was in solidarity with all the children who have been aborted since 1991 when the legislation was passed.
(CFT News, Oct 2006, written by Rosh Sahibdeen and excerpts from “The Bugle”, 6 Oct 2006)
(to index)

* CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INCREASE – The growing and urgent need for the administrators of South Africa's judicial system as well as the public to become aware of the rapidly expanding child pornography market emerged as one of the main themes during a three-day workshop for prosecutors in Durban this week.
The workshop was conducted by the National Prosecuting Authority and the Film and Publication Board in Durban.
Iyavar Chetty, head of Legal Services for the Film and Publication Board, said, “parents teach their children how to cross the road but do not have the knowledge to warn them of the dangers which now exist along the electronic super highway”.
“Our judiciary is also in urgent need of education. Far too often when offenders are caught and brought to court, they get no more than a slap on the wrist, unlike in the UK, America and Australia where sentences reflect the seriousness of this offence against children. We are dealing only with the tip of the iceberg when it comes to child pornography in South Africa. It's a thriving business”.
“Many of those involved in this racket are not necessarily perverts either, they are motivated solely by profit”.
“A couple in Texas who were recently brought to book, were averaging $1.4-million (about R10 million) a month from the child porn market,” Chetty claimed.
He said it was imperative that parents be made aware of the dangers which lurked in computer chat rooms and on cellphones.
“People are too busy to care until it is too late. A child could be under the impression that they are communicating with someone their own age, meanwhile they're being set up by a middle-aged pervert.
“Children are being stalked. There is a desperate need for high-tech crime investigators and for the establishment of specialist units in this country,” he added.
(The Independent, 14 Oct 2006)
(to index)

 

International

 

* DR PEET BOTHA TOURS THE NETHERLANDS SPEAKING ON HOMOSEXUALITY – For two weeks Dr Botha toured through the Netherlands with a clear message. Homosexuality is not something that a person is born with, but a specific choice. Deliverance from homosexuality is possible.

For the past eight years Dr Botha has studied the subject of homosexuality, and has written three books on the subject. He is currently a missionary and part of the leadership of a teacher's training college in South Africa. Developments within the Dutch Reformed church led him to seek for answers why the church changed from acknowledging that homosexuality was sin in 1986 to reviewing the matter almost 20 years later and eventually overturning their 1986 decision.

Dr Botha points out that Paul's condemnation of homosexuality in Rom 1 is also applicable to “long lasting, loving homosexual relationships”, because such things took place in his time. For example, the Roman Emperor, Nero, was married to a young man named Sporus.

Homosexuality was also a well-known phenomenon in the time of the Old Testament. The nations around Israel allowed the practice of homosexuality, while Israel was unique in condemning it based on God's Word. In fact, the whole matter of homosexuality, in whatever form, was so well known in the Old and New Testaments that Paul didn't have to elaborate on the matter.

According to the Bible homosexuality in all its forms is sin and it is still applicable to our day. “The Bible is the Word of God, and not the Word about God. The authority of the Bible is not negotiable”, says Dr Botha. “And when the Bible condemns homosexuality as sin, it also means that a person can find forgiveness and deliverance from this sin. In Prov 28:13 we read that 'he who confesses and forsakes his sin shall obtain mercy'. Homosexuality stands on the same level as other sins like anger, drunkenness and adultery. And according to the Bible a person can be delivered from these. Homosexuality is therefore not a born trait. What does science say? Paul writes in Rom 1:20 that nature itself declares God's purposes. Biologically man and woman are made for one another. Neither has any reputable study shown any homosexual gene”.

“Homosexuality is a choice a person makes, although various factors could have lead to the decision, e.g. a boy being dressed like a girl by his mother, or a child that has been molested etc. However, the final choice is made by the person in the same way a paedophile makes his choice. It boils down to under what authority a person makes his choice; and for a Christian that authority is the Bible, the Word of God”.

“Homosexuality is not a sickness but a sin for which deliverance is always possible through the Lord Jesus Christ. There are people who get deliverance even from homosexual feelings and temptation, and others who are never completely free from the temptation, even as heterosexual men should not lust after other women. I know of a woman who has been delivered from lesbian desires. She said that the answer for her was to stay away from places and to refrain from reading books which awaken those feelings”.

“The church must make it clear that Christ has come for the salvation of all sinners, including those who practice homosexuality. As long as a person wants to be helped and seeks deliverance from his or her sin, the church must not excommunicate them”.
(Translated from the “Nederlands Dagblad”, 4 Oct 2006) (to index)

* SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SCALIA DEBATES ACLU PRESIDENT ON ABORTION - Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia debated ACLU president Nadine Strossen on abortion and other political issues on Sunday. Scalia argued that nothing in the Constitution supports a right to abortion and warned Strossen that her aggressive approach of using the courts to further her agenda will come back to haunt her.

During the debate, Scalia told Strossen that unelected judges have no business in formulating public policy on highly-charged political issues like abortion. Instead, those decisions should be best left to lawmakers or the public.

"In controversial issues on stuff like ... abortion, we debate with each other and persuade each other and vote on it either through representatives or a constitutional amendment," Scalia said, according to an Associated Press report.

He added that the role of a Supreme Court justice should be interpreting the law, not inventing it.

"Whether it's good or bad is not my job. My job is simply to say if those things you find desirable are contained in the Constitution," he said.

Discussing pro-abortion judges who created a right to abortion, Scalia warned her, "Someday, you're going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret that approach."

But Strossen, according to AP, countered, "There are some rights that are so fundamental that no majority can take them away from any minority, no matter how small or unpopular that minority might be."

Scalia is one of the two members of the high court, including Justice Clarence Thomas, who have taken a pro-life position against the Roe v. Wade decision.

Joined by new Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, the four are thought to be the block of judges who will lead the way in overturning Roe once one more pro-life judge is added. The current Supreme Court is divided 5-4 in favour of abortion.
(LifeNews, 16 Oct 2006) (to index)

* PORTUGAL PARLIAMENT EXPECTED TO APPROVE ABORTION REFERENDUM THURSDAY - The Portuguese parliament is expected to approve an abortion referendum on Thursday. The measure, which would likely go before voters in January, would legalise abortion through the first 10 weeks of pregnancy in this strongly Catholic nation.

The governing centre-left Socialist Party has been pressing for legalizing abortion for some time and now the main opposition parties have said they won't oppose a national vote on abortion.

If the referendum is approved, the likely question will be: "Do you agree that an abortion performed during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, with the consent of the woman in a legal medical establishment, ceases to be viewed as a crime?"

Whether residents of the Western European national will approve the abortion referendum is another matter.

In 1998, Portuguese voters turned down a referendum seeking to legalize abortion by a 51-49 percentage vote and only 30 percent of those eligible to vote participated.

In March 2004, members of Portugal's parliament voted down three separate proposals to legalize abortion after more than 200,000 petitions were submitted against them.

"The solution for a woman in difficulty should never be the death of her unborn child," one of the leaders of a pro-life coalition, Teresa Aires de Campos, said after the vote.

"We want to create a society where a newborn child is never seen as a burden that needs to be eliminated. We want to create a country where a child is always welcomed."

Portugal currently bans abortions in most cases and they are only allowed in rare exceptions such as preventing the death of the mother or in cases of rape, incest, or when the baby has major physical disabilities. No abortions can be done after 12 weeks of pregnancy.

Approximately 1,000 legal abortions are currently done each year.

Ireland and Malta are other European nations with pro-life laws against abortion.
(LifeNews, 16 Oct 2006) (to index)

* BRITISH PRO-LIFE GROUP WANTS UNITED NATIONS TO BAN ABORTIONS WORLDWIDE - One of the leading pro-life organizations in England is calling on the United Nations to prohibit abortions worldwide. The group says the UN, which has called on nations to curb violence against children, should include protecting unborn children from the violence of abortion in that action alert.

Responding to the Wednesday publication of the UN Secretary General’s Study on Violence Against Children, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children called for the abortion ban.

"We are deeply saddened by the report's findings. Abuse of children seems to be widespread, and a lot of that abuse is hidden," John Smeaton, SPUC's national director, said in a press release LifeNews.com obtained.

"Today's UN report urges the prohibition of all violence against children," he added. "We urge the UN to include a worldwide prohibition of abortion, the greatest of all violence against young, defenceless human beings."

"The gravest abuse of children is to deprive them of life before they are even born," Smeaton explained.
(LifeNews, 12 Oct 2006) (to index)

* KEEP DARWIN'S 'LIES' OUT OF POLISH SCHOOLS: EDUCATION OFFICIAL - Poland's deputy education minister called for the influential evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin not to be taught in the country's schools, branding them "lies."

"The theory of evolution is a lie, an error that we have legalised as a common truth," Miroslaw Orzechowski, the deputy minister in the country's right-wing coalition government, was quoted as saying by the Gazeta Wyborcza Daily Saturday.

The evolution theory of the 19th-century British naturalist holds that existing animals and plants are the result of natural selection which eliminated inferior species gradually over time. This conflicts with the "creationist" theory that God created all life on the planet in a finite number.

Orzechowski called for a debate on whether Darwin's theory should be taught in schools.

"We should not teach lies, just as we should not teach bad instead of good, or ugliness instead of beauty," he said. "We are not going to withdraw (Darwin's theory) from the school books, but we should start to discuss it."
(Yahoo News, 14 Oct 2006) (to index)

* BREAKPOINT APPLAUDS “A MEANINGFUL WORLD”: INTELLIGENT DESIGN ARGUMENT BREAKS NEW GROUND - On 12 Oct 2006, long-time ID supporter Chuck Colson gave the first of two BreakPoint radio commentaries praising “A Meaningful World” by Benjamin Wiker and Jonathan Witt. While Mr. Colson is familiar with many of the arguments for design, he was quick to note that A Meaningful World is about so much more than the narrow concept that many people have of “intelligent design”. Their book’s subtitle helps explain their idea: How the Arts and Sciences Reveal the Genius of Nature. It’s an original and utterly fascinating approach to the subject.

Wiker and Witt have taken the argument for design to another level, posing questions that Darwinism is utterly incapable of answering, as Prison Fellowship Ministries President Mark Earley pointed out in a radio commentary:
“The authors ask that, if the world was born out of chance, how is it that nature acts according to rational laws? If we’re all here because of random and meaningless events, it doesn’t make sense that, one, there are mathematical and scientific laws that govern our world, and, two, that our efforts could discover what those laws are. We would be fumbling in the darkness of randomness, looking for explanations that didn’t even exist.
But the universe is full of design – design that extend to the smallest particles of an atom, that can be seen in the orderliness of the periodic table of elements. Furthermore, they are patterns that the human mind could discover and comprehend. How does random chance explain all that?”
(Science and Culture, 13 Oct 2006) (to index)

* MUSLIM STABS WIFE WHEN DAUGHTER BECOMES CHRISTIAN - A devout Muslim woman was attacked and stabbed to death, allegedly by her husband, after their 17-year-old daughter announced she was embracing Christianity, according to police and news reports.

According to Assist News Service, neighbours of the Australian family reported "blood curdling" and "terrifying" screams, along with cries of "Help me, help me, they're trying to kill me," on Monday night.

"From what we understand the daughter decided to tell her father of her radical plan to convert to Christianity which, in the eyes of most Muslims, is totally unacceptable and to be honest, sadly, many would react as he has done," a Muslim source told "The Gold Coast Bulletin."

"It is the Islamic way that if a son or daughter does or plans to do something that is unacceptable or wrong for a Muslim then it is the mother who is automatically at fault and will bear the brunt of the blame," the source said.
(WorldNetDaily, 14 Oct 2006) (to index)

 

 

 

revolv.gif (20906 bytes) CFT Home